by Shailesh Rao
The
Shakespeare Jubilee in 1769 is often seen as the "point at which Shakespeare
stopped being regarded as an increasingly popular and admirable dramatist,
and became a god"(Deelman, The Great Shakespeare Jubilee, 7). This
event is also given credit for inspiring and influencing the hundreds of
festivals that have followed in its wake. It is generally accepted that
all such celebrations, "have their roots in the first Jubilee"(5). In addition
to these changes in the cultural conceptions of Shakespeare and his devout
bardolites, the Jubilee is also seen as the single event that has changed
the economic and social function of Stratford-upon-Avon. Given these far
reaching effects upon many different realms of culture and society, it
may come as a shock that many of the contemporaries of David Garrick (the
brains, bucks, and balls behind the Jubilee) regarded his landmark event
as "a gigantically comic fiasco"(6). How could something viewed as a colossal
failure turn out to be such a significant part of the bard's evolution?
In attempting to answer this question, it is imperative to realize that
however ridiculous the Jubilee seemed, and may indeed, have been, it was
always an endeavor that was very impressive. It was this quality of being
an incredibly complex and innovative undertaking, combined with its commonly
accepted immediate failure, that reveals how crucial a role the Jubilee
played in Shakespeare's cultural development.
David Garrick was in tune with
the lucrative opportunities that were tucked away on the banks of Stratford
many years before the Jubilee took place. When Thomas Sharpe, a Stratford
merchant, had the insight to see that trinkets and tools carved from the
wood of a mulberry tree, rumored to have been planted by Shakespeare, could
attract both the attention and shillings of a large group of theatrical
enthusiasts, an industry was born. Garrick was hip to this unexplored treasure
chest occupied by two things that were dear to him-- Shakespeare and money.
It was five years after this
encounter with pricey pieces of wood that another opportunity presented
itself, in 1767. The town hall in Stratford was in dire need of refurbishing,
only the Corporation (municipal institution) was a little short of the
necessary funds. Those brainy guys up there in Stratford came up with the
idea of soliciting members of the theater community who would hopefully
jump at the chance to be connected to the birthplace of their hometown
hero, Shakespeare. The corporation was trying "to persuade some gullible
well-wisher into making a truly dramatic contribution"(58). David Garrick,
a self-proclaimed (and proclaimed loudly at that) worshipper of the bard,
seemed like an easy target. Through a series of connections, from poets
to politicians, Garrick was brought on board the effort to rebuild Stratford's
town hall.
Yet, the shrewd and sneaky leaders
of the Stratford community were not ready for the manner in which Garrick
would attempt to turn the tables. It turns out that in appreciation for
Garrick's contribution, the town of Stratford was offering their "Freedom"(the
equivalent of the key to the city or a similar honorary gesture)
to this good samaritan. Garrick, not lacking in his own sense for golden
opportunities, decided to turn this ceremony honoring his generosity into
a huge celebration dedicated to the reason he was interested in Stratford
in the first place-- Shakespeare. Once again, the town of Stratford held
the key to Garrick's interest, only this time it was not Shakespeare and
money, but Shakespeare combined with the fame that such a celebration would
bring him. Deelman notes that "his ruling passion was the love of fame"(85).
It
had long been common practice to praise Shakespeare effusively, "but whereas
previous actors had contributed to Shakespeare's fame in relative silence,
Garrick trumpeted his worship of the bard to every corner of England and
Europe"(37). Garrick saw this as the once in lifetime chance to pay tribute
to his hero, while allowing him to enact numerous gestures of self-aggrandizement.
The Corporation quickly realized that it had not picked an unwitting dupe,
but a man "whose whole art consisted in the manipulation of the feelings
of others"(73). Despite recognizing the opportunistic advances of Garrick,
the town assented to his ideas, looking forward to the possible benefits
of this newly forged partnership. The Council became "hypnotised by the
vision of Stratford and themselves occupying so important a place in the
public eye"(73). In Garrick, the Corporation saw a man who could import
the exclusive worlds of fashion and literature associated with metropolitan
life to the provincial town of Stratford.
Garrick had achieved this high
measure of notoriety through his innovations in acting. He brought an unprecedented
degree of realism and naturalism to the stage, resulting in never-before-seen
modes of theatrical gesture and expression. Garrick had such a powerful
theatrical presence that he often made Shakespeare more palatable and attractive
simply because he was acting. Many people learned to love Shakespeare through
Garrick. The Jubilee granted Garrick the possibility of further developing
this relationship.
David Garrick was not admired
just for his superb acting skills alone. He also demonstrated his talents
in the field of what we would today refer to as public relations. Within
seven years of his Shakespearean debut as Richard III in 1741, Garrick
became the joint owner of the Drury Lane theater and helped it to pull
in the largest profits in over fifteen years. It was his ability to manage
the theater, and his management skills in general, for which Garrick received
so much credit. "He was not only at the top of his profession," but he
was seen as "the unchallenged dictator of all things theatrical"(82). Among
his managerial talents was his "infallible sense of what the public wanted,"(31)
the ability to effectively present and make use of information, his "deep
understanding of the art of showmanship," skills in large scale organization,
his experience dealing with temperamental people(97), and his ability to
control publicity(137).
It was this power to control
publicity that enabled him to initiate a powerful media campaign that would
have rivaled the abilities of modern advertisers. "The newspapers seized
upon the Jubilee and month after month, devoted more and more space to
it"(116).
Over the nest few months the
newspaper campaign was to mount to an incredible climax. Already poems
and satirical comments were beginning to appear. Soon they would dominate
the pages. Some ridiculed the affair, others praised it. Everyone was interested
in the public spectacle of Garrick celebrating his partnership with Shakespeare.(74)
The campaign took on a life of
its own, and if there was a word to characterize this aspect of the Jubilee,
it would be controversy. Most scholars looked upon Garrick with scorn,
thinking that the Jubilee was devoid of intellectual worth. Even Samuel
Johnson, Garrick's friend, decided to boycott the ceremonies. Others, such
as Samuel Foote and George Steevens, continually poked fun at Garrick's
dream. Still more remained excited about the Jubilee, scrambling for tickets
and reservations in Stratford. Garrick's plan worked like a charm. Despite
the fact that there were varying opinions concerning the Jubilee, "the
attention of all of England would, early in September, be focused on the
small country town"(137).
As
the date of the Jubilee neared, the interest in this small town grew exponentially.
As Deelman puts it, "Stratford was news"(133). However, the ideal relationship
that the Corporation envisioned did not come without its drawbacks. It
seemed as if Garrick's assumption that the residents of Stratford existed
simply to make the town presentable to their cosmopolitan and cultured
guests was becoming a reality. This is seen most visibly in the plan to
have the visitors outfitted with multi-colored ribbons in order to "distinguish
the worshippers from the local inhabitants"(105). To Garrick, it seemed
that the residents of the Stratford community were mere providers of services
who should be barred from participation in the activities of the Jubilee.
Garrick's festival reduced the people of Stratford to employees at an amusement
park, only the amusement park was also their home.
And what would a Bardolatry
fantasyland be without souvenirs. The arrival of the Jubilee also brought
with it the mass production of cultural products that centered around Shakespeare.
This marketing strategy can also be seen with the position taken by Garrick's
literary agent, Thomas Beckett. Beckett proclaimed himself the official
bookseller of the Jubilee as he was quick to take advantage of the excitement
surrounding the gathering in Stratford. He, like many others marketing
Shakespearean products, knew that could make a killing at the Jubilee where
interests would be piqued. It should come as no surprise that the pictures,
plays, and songbooks that Beckett was selling were all directly related
to Garrick and the Jubilee, and had little or nothing to do with Shakespeare
outside the setting of Stratford's three day circus. Selling Shakespeare
was clearly not as important as making sure the Jubilee was a success.
After the Jubilee, Shakespeare could no longer simply exist as an accomplished
writer or thespian, he had become a complex marketing strategy.
The Jubilee was developing into
an affair that was a "theatrical rather than a scholarly gathering"(180).
It was an event that was not so much concerned with the works and accomplishments
of Shakespeare, as celebrating the various and continually proliferating
and perforating cultural trends that were springing forth from the bosom
of the bard. With all the pageantry, parades, balls, and fireworks, one
does not have to scrutinize Garrick's motivations to realize that he "had
knowingly chosen to celebrate his God in terms calculated to appeal to
the masses, fashionable or not, rather than to the intellectuals"(260).
Targeting this audience seems to adhere to Garrick's real agenda. Hidden
under the ostensible and apparently noble aim of honoring a significant
literary figure, is the more appropriate description of the Jubilee--celebrating
not Shakespeare, but the ways in which we can worship him.
Despite these criticisms of
the Jubilee, it still retained the potential to be a three-day long party
on the banks of the Avon. Alas, the skies above Stratford did not want
to cooperate, and after a splendid opening day that had skeptics
buttoning
their lips and joining in the festivities, the rain came pouring down.
Needless to say, there was no joy in Stratford. Garrick attempted to continue
the celebration through the second day, but the rains proved to be too
much. The fireworks display was ruined and the specially built rotunda
that was a replica of Garrick's personal shrine to Shakespeare was submerged
under half a foot of water. It rained so much during this two day period
that the Corporation almost changed the name if the town to Stratford-under-Avon.
The rain only exacerbated the mounting problems concerning the lack of
accommodations, the insufficient dining services, the stifling amounts
of traffic, and the general chaos that seemed to rise with the rains. Garrick
was forced to cancel the activities on the third day, and many people left
cursing his name as well as the Bard's.
The one bright spot was Garrick's
performance of his Ode upon dedicating a building and, erecting a statue,
to Shakespeare, at Stratford-upon-Avon. Despite the rain, and flooding,
people crowded into the rotunda to hear Garrick's now famous dedication.
It was received with enthusiasm and awe as the audience fell into an appreciative
silence. It was the greatest performance of Garrick's life, and it was
the shining moment of the Jubilee. In fact, it was captured in many poems,
articles, and plays that attest to the power of Garrick, his Jubilee and
their influence on the emergence of Bardolatry and our perspective on Shakespeare
in general. The Ode was often repeated and performed for many years
after the Jubilee. Such post Jubilee sentiment not only inspired the resurgence
of Shakespeare as a cultural icon, and the growth of his cultural significance
throughout Europe, but it also led to the planning of future events that
aimed to emulate Garrick's Great Jubilee of 1769.
The Jubilee also had a profound
effect upon the town of Stratford, "where the result of the worshipping
cult was felt most strongly. The whole future history of the borough stems
from Garrick's decision to hold his Jubilee there"(258). Initially, the
Corporation found comfort in the fact that they did not have to share in
the losses incurred by Garrick, a financial blow that tallied £2000.
And after a week of some minor adjustments, the town returned to normal.
Within two years, however, representatives of Stratford contacted Garrick
inquiring whether he would be interested in taking part in another Jubilee.
For obvious reasons, Garrick wanted absolutely nothing to do with such
a thing, but he continued to be pestered by numerous requests to organize
another Stratford Jubilee. Although Garrick and his Jubilee had left town,
their spirit and the profit for potential lingered around Stratford. The
Jubilee influenced members of the Stratford community as well as cultural
elites, who could now entertained visions of a true Bardolatry Wonderland.
Although he would not help it to bloom, Garrick with his Jubilee, the first
of its kind, had definitely planted the seed. "Since 1769, every major
Shakespeare anniversary has been celebrated [in Stratford]. Gradually the
festival has become an annual one, until today it occupies most of the
year. Without it, the town could not live"(5).
Perhaps the most striking and
disturbing aspect of the Jubilee is the shift that reconciled and replanted
Shakespeare within popular culture, his original medium. Unfortunately
for Shakespeare, by the time of the Jubilee popular culture had begun a
tremendous transformation into the complex modern commodified Culture Industry
that we encounter in shopping malls and on Oprah. For the bard, there could
be no return to the Globe Theater(without a Sam Wanamaker, a gift shop,
and Margaret Thatcher).
Shakespeare had moved out
of the quiet studies of scholars, had moved from the glare of stage lights,
out into the world of the common reader. It was no longer his plays which
commanded most interest. People who had never read or heard a line from
them were now absorbed in reading about the man himself, and his birthplace.
A new cult had been initiated. Bardolatry was becoming and industry.



